Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 69 (2), 178-186
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.69.2.178
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the prevalence of changes in mood, personality, and behaviour in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and hence, which features reliably distinguish between them. To establish whether the frontal and temporal variants of FTD are characterised by different behavioural changes. METHODS A questionnaire was designed to assess a wide range of neuropsychiatric changes; it incorporated features reported in previous studies of FTD and components of the neuropsychiatric inventory.1 This was completed by 37 carers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 33 patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), comprising 20 with temporal variant FTD (tv FTD) or semantic dementia and 13 with frontal variant FTD (fv FTD). An exploratory principal components factor analysis and discriminant function analysis was applied. RESULTS Factor analysis showed four robust and meaningful symptom clusters: factor 1—stereotypic and eating behaviour; factor 2—executive dysfunction and self care; factor 3—mood changes; factor 4—loss of social awareness. Only stereotypic and altered eating behaviour and loss of social awareness reliably differentiated AD from FTD with no effect of disease severity. By contrast, executive dysfunction, poor self care, and restlessness showed a significant effect of disease severity only, with the more impaired patients scoring more highly. Changes in mood were found to be equally prevalent in the three patient groups. Analysis of individual symptoms showed increased rates of mental rigidity and depression in the patients with semantic dementia compared with those with fv FTD. Conversely, the latter group showed greater disinhibition. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified 71.4% overall and 86.5% of the patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS This questionnaire disclosed striking differences between patients with FTD and AD, but only stereotypic behaviour, changes in eating preference, disinhibition, and features of poor social awareness reliably separated the groups. The patients with fv FTD and semantic dementia were behaviourally very similar, reflecting the involvement of a common network, the ventral frontal lobe, temporal pole, and amygdala. Dysexecutive symptoms and poor self care were found to be affected by the severity of the disease, reflecting perhaps spread to dorsolateral prefrontal areas relatively late in the course of both FTD and AD. This questionnaire may be of value in the diagnosis and the monitoring of therapies.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- A voxel-based morphometry study of semantic dementia: relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory.2000
- Frontotemporal lobar degenerationNeurology, 1998
- Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's diseaseNeurology, 1984
- Specific impairments of planningPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1982
- A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of DementiaThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1982
- Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementiaAnnals of Neurology, 1982
- Regional pattern of degeneration in Alzheimer's disease: neuronal loss and histopathological gradingHistopathology, 1981
- A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe DefectsCortex, 1976
- Loss of social group affinity following prefrontal lesions in free-ranging macaquesBrain Research, 1973
- The Psychiatric Differentiation of Senility and ArteriosclerosisThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1972