Dimer X in hysterosalpingography
- 1 February 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 50 (590), 101-104
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-50-590-101
Abstract
The incidence of abdominal pain during hysterosalpingography was assessed from replies to postal questionnaires completed by 42 patients receiving Diaginol Viscous and 23 patients receiving Dimer X: the questionnaires were analyzed using a double-blind technique. In the Diaginol Viscous group, 58.5% of patients experienced moderate or severe pain during the injection as compared with an incidence of only 19% in the group receiving Dimer X. In 3 of the patients receiving Diaginol Viscous, there was brief loss of consciousness. Radiographic quality was satisfactory with both contrast media. After-effects of hysterosalpingography were relatively common and included: lower abdominal pain; vaginal bleeding; temporary difficulty in walking and menstrual disturbances in subsequent periods. No correlation could be demonstrated between the type of medium used and the incidence of these after effects.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adverse Reactions to Contrast Agents Scope of ProblemInvestigative Radiology, 1970
- A clinical and radiological evaluation comparing the use of two contrast media in hysterosalpingography—Salpix and UrografinThe British Journal of Radiology, 1969
- HysterosalpingographyJournal of the Faculty of Radiologists, 1959