Non‐stereoselective reversal of neuropathic pain by naloxone and naltrexone: involvement of toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4)
Top Cited Papers
- 4 July 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 28 (1), 20-29
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06321.x
Abstract
Although activated spinal cord glia contribute importantly to neuropathic pain, how nerve injury activates glia remains controversial. It has recently been proposed, on the basis of genetic approaches, that toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) may be a key receptor for initiating microglial activation following L5 spinal nerve injury. The present studies extend this idea pharmacologically by showing that TLR4 is key for maintaining neuropathic pain following sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury (CCI). Established neuropathic pain was reversed by intrathecally delivered TLR4 receptor antagonists derived from lipopolysaccharide. Additionally, (+)-naltrexone, (+)-naloxone, and (−)-naloxone, which we show here to be TLR4 antagonists in vitro on both stably transfected HEK293-TLR4 and microglial cell lines, suppressed neuropathic pain with complete reversal upon chronic infusion. Immunohistochemical analyses of spinal cords following chronic infusion revealed suppression of CCI-induced microglial activation by (+)-naloxone and (−)-naloxone, paralleling reversal of neuropathic pain. Together, these CCI data support the conclusion that neuron-to-glia signaling through TLR4 is important not only for initiating neuropathic pain, as suggested previously, but also for maintaining established neuropathic pain. Furthermore, these studies suggest that the novel TLR4 antagonists (+)-naloxone and (−)-naloxone can each fully reverse established neuropathic pain upon multi-day administration. This finding with (+)-naloxone is of potential clinical relevance. This is because (+)-naloxone is an antagonist that is inactive at the (−)-opioid selective receptors on neurons that produce analgesia. Thus, these data suggest that (+)-opioid antagonists such as (+)-naloxone may be useful clinically to suppress glial activation, yet (−)-opioid agonists suppress pain.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Glia as the “bad guys”: Implications for improving clinical pain control and the clinical utility of opioidsBrain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2006
- Propentofylline attenuates vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in the ratNeuroscience Letters, 2006
- Minocycline attenuates mechanical allodynia and proinflammatory cytokine expression in rat models of pain facilitationPain, 2005
- Neuropathic pain and spinal microglia: a big problem from molecules in ‘small’ gliaTrends in Neurosciences, 2005
- Evidence that exogenous and endogenous fractalkine can induce spinal nociceptive facilitation in ratsEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2004
- Essential role for TIRAP in activation of the signalling cascade shared by TLR2 and TLR4Nature, 2002
- Antiallodynic effects of a CCKB antagonist in rats with nerve ligation injury: role of endogenous enkephalinsNeuroscience Letters, 1996
- A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in manPain, 1988
- Efficient estimation of sensory thresholdsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1986