Effect of the number of scale points on chi‐square fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Vol. 4 (2), 108-120
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519709540064
Abstract
This article investigates the effect of the number of item response categories on chi‐square statistics for confirmatory factor analysis to assess whether a greater number of categories increases the likelihood of identifying spurious factors, as previous research had concluded. Four types of continuous single‐factor data were simulated for a 20‐item test: (a) uniform for all items, (b) symmetric unimodal for all items, (c) negatively skewed for all items, or (d) negatively skewed for 10 items and positively skewed for 10 items. For each of the 4 types of distributions, item responses were divided to yield item scores with 2,4, or 6 categories. The results indicated that the chi‐square statistic for evaluating a single‐factor model was most inflated (suggesting spurious factors) for 2‐category responses and became less inflated as the number of categories increased. However, the Satorra‐Bentler scaled chi‐square tended not to be inflated even for 2‐category responses, except if the continuous item data had both negatively and positively skewed distributions.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.Psychological Methods, 1996
- Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non‐normal data in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo studyBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1991
- Asymptotic Chi-Square Tests for a Large Class of Factor Analysis ModelsThe Annals of Statistics, 1990
- Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- The Asymptotic Normal Distribution of Estimators in Factor Analysis under General ConditionsThe Annals of Statistics, 1988
- The Sensitivity of Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis to Violations of Measurement Scale and Distributional AssumptionsJournal of Marketing Research, 1987
- State vs trait anxiety: A case study in confirmatory factor analysisPersonality and Individual Differences, 1982
- Pearson's R and Coarsely Categorized MeasuresAmerican Sociological Review, 1981
- Magnitude estimations of expressions of frequency and amount.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974