Instructional Design Variations in Internet-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 85 (5), 909-922
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d6c319
Abstract
Purpose A recent systematic review (2008) described the effectiveness of Internet-based learning (IBL) in health professions education. A comprehensive synthesis of research investigating how to improve IBL is needed. This systematic review sought to provide such a synthesis. Method The authors searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, TimeLit, and the University of Toronto Research and Development Resource Base for articles published from 1990 through November 2008. They included all studies quantifying the effect of IBL compared with another Internet-based or computer-assisted instructional intervention on practicing and student physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dentists, and other health professionals. Reviewers working independently and in duplicate abstracted information, coded study quality, and grouped studies according to inductively identified themes. Results From 2,705 articles, the authors identified 51 eligible studies, including 30 randomized trials. The pooled effect size (ES) for learning outcomes in 15 studies investigating high versus low interactivity was 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.46; P = .006). Also associated with higher learning were practice exercises (ES 0.40 [0.08-0.71; P = .01]; 10 studies), feedback (ES 0.68 [0.01-1.35; P = .047]; 2 studies), and repetition of study material (ES 0.19 [0.09-0.30; P < .001]; 2 studies). The ES was 0.26 (-0.62 to 1.13; P = .57) for three studies examining online discussion. Inconsistency was large (I-2 >= 89%) in most analyses. Meta-analyses for other themes generally yielded imprecise results. Conclusions Interactivity, practice exercises, repetition, and feedback seem to be associated with improved learning outcomes, although inconsistency across studies tempers conclusions. Evidence for other instructional variations remains inconclusive.Keywords
This publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit:
- Proposed Standards for Medical Education Submissions to the Journal of General Internal MedicineJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Adapting Web-based Instruction to Residents’ Knowledge Improves Learning EfficiencyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Lack of interaction between sensing–intuitive learning styles and problem-first versus information-first instruction: a randomized crossover trialAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2007
- Application of distance learning to interactive seminar instruction in orthodontic residency programsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2007
- Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversiesClinical Medicine, 2007
- The case of the misleading funnel plotBMJ, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- A review of evaluative studies of computer-based learning in nursing educationNurse Education Today, 2001
- The research we should be doingAcademic Medicine, 1994
- Computer-Based Instruction and Health Professions EducationEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1992