"Nature versus nurture" and incompletely penetrant mutations
Open Access
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 72 (6), 686-689
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.72.6.686
Abstract
Lessons from twin studies of parkinson's disease The debate over the relative roles of “nature versus nurture” remains unresolved in many fields of study, from childhood education to animal behaviour or neurodegenerative disorders. Points of view frequently are polarised, either nature or nurture, rather then exploring the ways in which both sides play critical and complementary roles. Proponents of “nature” argue that human attributes are uniquely and primarily conditioned by genetics, opposing the view of those who think that environmental influences and experience determine individual differences. Arguments similar to those brought to bear regarding acquisition of skills, language, or cognitive styles also apply to human pathology. Often, in the discussion of disease the terms used are “genetic” versus “environmental”, but the implication is the same as in the “nature” versus “nurture” debate. Disorders considered to be primarily genetic are ones in which the presence or absence of genetic mutations is the primary determinant of disease, independent of environmental circumstances. A disease considered to be primarily environmental is one in which people of virtually any genetic background can develop the disease provided that they are exposed to the necessary environmental factor or factors. However, for many disorders, the risk is strongly influenced by both genetic and environmental factors.1, 2 For example, a susceptibility gene may strongly influence the risk of developing a disease only in response to a specific environmental exposure. If the environmental exposure occurs infrequently, the gene will be of low penetrance, and it may seem that the environmental exposure is the primary determinant of the disease, even though the gene is required for developing the disease. Therefore, even when environmental agents are suspected to be a major cause of a particular disease, this does not exclude the possibility that genetic factors also play a major part, particularly …Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Familial Aggregation of Parkinson's Disease in IcelandNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Parkinson Disease in TwinsJAMA, 1999
- Symposium overview: the role of genetic polymorphism and repair deficiencies in environmental disease [published erratum appears in Toxicol Sci 1999 Oct;51(2):317]Toxicological Sciences, 1999
- Parkinson Disease in TwinsAn Etiologic StudyJAMA, 1999
- Mutation in the α-Synuclein Gene Identified in Families with Parkinson's DiseaseScience, 1997
- Genetic evidence for the involvement of τ in progressive supranuclear palsyAnnals of Neurology, 1997
- Mutant mtDNA at 1555 A to G in 12S rRNA Gene and Hypersusceptibility of Mitochondrial Translation to Streptomycin Can Be Co-Transferred to ρ0HeLa CellsBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1996
- Prevalence of Parkinson's disease in the elderlyNeurology, 1995
- The apolipoprotein ε4 allele in patients with Alzheimer's diseaseAnnals of Neurology, 1993
- Mitochondrial ribosomal RNA mutation associated with both antibiotic–induced and non–syndromic deafnessNature Genetics, 1993