Outcome of Total Hip Replacement
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 390 (390), 163-172
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200109000-00019
Abstract
During the past 40 years, improvements have been made in the technique, implant, and surgical environment for total hip replacement, which today is one of the most cost-effective operations done. The aim of this study was to compare different outcome measurement methods and to develop recommendations for optimal followup of total hip replacement. The study involved the outcome of 2604 randomly selected patients in Sweden treated surgically with a modern technique. General questionnaires (the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and the Nottingham Health Profile) were compared with disease-specific questionnaires (the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and the Harris hip score). The study showed a good correlation between the studied questionnaires, and all questionnaires used could be suitable for followup study after hip replacement surgery. In clinical practice and for research, a general and disease-specific self-administered score should be used. Some patients (older and low cerebral capacity) have difficulties answering questions on these questionnaires. A new short self-administered general and disease-specific questionnaire was designed: the Total Hip Replacement score. The Total Hip Replacement score provides information about the result of the hip arthroplasty, and the results can be compared with results of other surgical interventions.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of life analysis in patients with lower limb ischaemia: Suggestions for European standardisationEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1997
- Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996
- Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly populationQuality of Life Research, 1996
- Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of lifeQuality of Life Research, 1993
- A statistical analysis of hip scoresThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1993
- Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaireQuality of Life Research, 1993
- Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.BMJ, 1992
- Relationship between severity and clinical importance of symptoms in osteoarthritisClinical Rheumatology, 1991
- Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systemsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1990
- HIP ASSESSMENT: A COMPARISON OF NINE DIFFERENT METHODSThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1972