Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 June 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 43 (6), 994-1002
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NH14-002)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic reviewJournal of Minimal Access Surgery, 2012
- Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy—perioperative and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer compared to laparoscopic and open radical surgeryGynecological Surgery, 2011
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: Comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium HospitalGynecologic Oncology, 2011
- Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- A Case-Control Study of Robotic Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Using 3 Robotic Arms Compared With Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical CancerInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2010
- From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curveGynecological Surgery, 2010
- Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Compared With Open Radical HysterectomyInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2010
- Robotic approach for cervical cancer: Comparison with laparotomy A case control studyGynecologic Oncology, 2009
- A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003