The Role of Anorexia in Resistance and Tolerance to Infections in Drosophila
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Biology
- Vol. 7 (7), e1000150
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000150
Abstract
Most infections induce anorexia but its function, if any, remains unclear. Because this response is common among animals, we hypothesized that infection-induced diet restriction might be an adaptive trait that modulates the host's ability to fight infection. Two defense strategies protect hosts against infections: resistance, which is the ability to control pathogen levels, and tolerance, which helps the host endure infection-induced pathology. Here we show that infected fruit flies become anorexic and that diet restriction alters defenses, increasing the fly's tolerance to Salmonella typhimurium infections while decreasing resistance to Listeria monocytogenes. This suggests that attempts to extend lifespan through diet restriction or the manipulation of pathways mimicking this process will have complicated effects on a host's ability to fight infections. Two routes to decreasing susceptibility to infection are resistance (the ability to clear pathogens) and tolerance (the ability to limit damage in response to pathogens). Anorexia induced by sickness puts animals into a diet-restricted state, a state that is generally believed to extend lifespan. We asked whether anorexia induced by sickness would alter the immune response. We measured the effects of diet restriction on both resistance and tolerance to two different infections in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. In one case we found that infection induced anorexia and the resulting diet restriction increased tolerance to this infection, thereby increasing survival of flies infected with this pathogen; however, this is not a universal effect. In a second case we found another pathogen that induced anorexia but here diet restriction lead to a reduction in resistance that collapsed the immune response and caused the fly to die faster. The relationship between diet restriction and immunity is complicated and must be evaluated on a pathogen-by-pathogen basis.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Animal Defenses against Infectious Agents: Is Damage Control More Important Than Pathogen ControlPLoS Biology, 2008
- A Signaling Protease Required for Melanization in Drosophila Affects Resistance and Tolerance of InfectionsPLoS Biology, 2008
- Aging and Survival: The Genetics of Life Span Extension by Dietary RestrictionAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 2008
- Circadian Regulation in the Ability of Drosophila to Combat Pathogenic InfectionsCurrent Biology, 2008
- The effects of temperature on host–pathogen interactions in D. melanogaster: Who benefits?Journal of Insect Physiology, 2008
- Dual Detection of Fungal Infections in Drosophila via Recognition of Glucans and Sensing of Virulence FactorsCell, 2006
- Flexible diet choice offsets protein costs of pathogen resistance in a caterpillarProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- Secreted Bacterial Effectors and Host-Produced Eiger/TNF Drive Death in a Salmonella-Infected Fruit FlyPLoS Biology, 2004
- Thermal biology in insect-parasite interactionsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003
- Role of hemolysin for the intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1988