Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: systematic review
Open Access
- 12 March 2009
- Vol. 338 (mar12 2), b866
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b866
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether informed consent introduces selection bias in prospective observational studies using data from medical records, and consent rates for such studies.Design Systematic review.Data sources Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2008, reference lists from pertinent articles, and searches of electronic citations.Study selection Prospective observational studies reporting characteristics of participants and non-participants approached for informed consent to use their medical records. Studies were selected independently in duplicate; a third reviewer resolved disagreements.Data extraction Age, sex, race, education, income, or health status of participants and non-participants, the participation rate in each study, and susceptibility of these calculations to threats of selection and reporting bias.Results Of 1650 citations 17 unique studies met inclusion criteria and had analysable data. Across all outcomes there were differences between participants and non-participants; however, there was a lack of consistency in the direction and the magnitude of effect. Of 161 604 eligible patients, 66.9% consented to use of data from their medical records.Conclusions Significant differences between participants and non-participants may threaten the validity of results from observational studies that require consent for use of data from medical records. To ensure that legislation on privacy does not unduly bias observational studies using medical records, thoughtful decision making by research ethics boards on the need for mandatory consent is necessary.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke NetworkBMC Medical Ethics, 2006
- Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their resultsCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005
- Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal ResearchAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act (HIPAA) RegulationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Predictors of depressive symptoms in older people--a survey of two general practice populationsAge and Ageing, 2003
- Identifying Clinical Trials in the Medical Literature with Electronic DatabasesControlled Clinical Trials, 2000
- Control Response Proportions in Population-Based Case-Control Studies in GermanyEpidemiology, 1999
- Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic ReviewsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1998
- Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- PRIVACY PROTECTION IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND MEDICAL RESEARCH: A CHALLENGE AND A RESPONSIBILITYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1977