The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone
- 9 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Vol. 89A (4), 942-950
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32041
Abstract
The present study investigated the effects of surface chemistry and topography on the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Three groups of implants were compared: (1) machine-turned implants (turned implants), (2) machine-turned and aluminum oxide-blasted implants (blasted implants), and (3) implants that were machine-turned, aluminum oxide-blasted, and processed with the micro-arc oxidation method (Mg implants). Three and six weeks after implant insertion in rabbit tibiae, the implant osseointegration strength and rate were evaluated. Surface chemistry revealed characteristic differences of nine at.% Mg for Mg implants and 11 at.% Al for blasted implants. In terms of surface roughness, there was no difference between Mg implants and blasted implants in developed surface ratio (Sdr; p = 0.69) or summit density (Sds; p = 0.96), but Mg implants had a significantly lower arithmetic average height deviation (Sa) value than blasted implants (p = 0.007). At both 3 and 6 weeks, Mg implants demonstrated significantly higher osseointegration strength compared with turned (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001) and blasted (p = 0.0001, p = 0.035) implants, whereas blasted implants showed significantly higher osseointegration than turned implants at 6 weeks (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.199). The present results not only support the hypothesis that biochemical bonding facilitates rapid and strong integration of implants in bone, but also provide evidence for biochemical bonding theory previously proposed by Sul. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1 – experimental implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2006
- The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implantsBiomaterials, 2005
- Biomechanical Measurements of Calcium‐Incorporated Oxidized Implants in Rabbit Bone: Effect of Calcium Surface Chemistry of a Novel ImplantClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2004
- Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown:Biomaterials, 2002
- A comparative study of removal torque of endosseous implants in the fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: Preliminary reportClinical Oral Implants Research, 1997
- Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topographyBiomaterials, 1996
- Biological aspects of implant dentistry: osseointegrationPeriodontology 2000, 1994
- Surface spectroscopic characterization of titanium implant materialsApplied Surface Science, 1990
- Strength of bonding between A-W glass-ceramic and the surface of bone cortexJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1988
- Surface defects of TiO2(110): A combined XPS, XAES AND ELS studySurface Science, 1984