Case study on the use of genuine progress indicator to measure urban economic welfare in China
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Ecological Economics
- Vol. 63 (2-3), 463-475
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodology for an urban ecological footprint to evaluate sustainable development in ChinaInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2006
- A theoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and other related indexesEcological Economics, 2003
- On the methodology of ISEW, GPI and related measures: some constructive suggestions and some doubt on the ‘threshold’ hypothesisEcological Economics, 2000
- The genuine progress indicator methodological developments and results from AustraliaEcological Economics, 1999
- An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for ChileEcological Economics, 1999
- Has Australia surpassed its optimal macroeconomic scale? Finding out with the aid of `benefit' and `cost' accounts and a sustainable net benefit indexEcological Economics, 1999
- Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for ScotlandEcological Economics, 1999
- Measurement of social well-being: alternatives to gross domestic productEcological Economics, 1998
- Measuring sustainable development: progress on indicatorsEnvironment and Development Economics, 1996
- Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainabilityEcological Economics, 1993