Obstetric Anesthesia Workforce Survey
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 103 (3), 645-653
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Analgesia Given Early versus Late in LaborNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- ACOG Committee Opinion #295Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- The Insidiousness of Brain Retractor Pressure: Another “Smoking Gun”?Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2003
- Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysisBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002
- Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choiceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- The Shortage of Anesthesiologists: An Unwelcome Lesson for Other Medical SpecialtiesMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2001
- Nulliparas' Preferences for Epidural Analgesia: Their Effects on Actual Use in LaborBirth, 1999
- Obstetric Anesthesia Work Force Survey, 1981 versus 1992Anesthesiology, 1997
- NEUROMUSCULAR AND CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS OF RANITIDINE HClAnesthesiology, 1986
- Continuous infusion epidurals for obstetric analgesiaCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1985