The Size-Distance Paradox: A Reply to Gilinsky
- 1 September 1956
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Illinois Press in The American Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 69 (3), 469-476
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1419056
Abstract
"Gilinsky''s methods of analysis (see 30: 3952) are shown to be ambiguous and inconsistent. Her mathematical theory of space perception is derived from three fundamental propositions, two of which are shown to be contradicted by a variety of experimental results.".Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distance judgment by the method of fractionation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- The effect of prior training with a scale of distance on absolute and relative judgments of distance over ground.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- Perceived size and distance in visual space.Psychological Review, 1951