Hierarchical modeling of protein interactions
- 13 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Molecular Modeling
- Vol. 13 (6-7), 691-698
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-007-0177-8
Abstract
A novel approach to hierarchical peptide–protein and protein–protein docking is described and evaluated. Modeling procedure starts from a reduced space representation of proteins and peptides. Polypeptide chains are represented by strings of alpha-carbon beads restricted to a fine-mesh cubic lattice. Side chains are represented by up to two centers of interactions, corresponding to beta-carbons and the centers of mass of the remaining portions of the side groups, respectively. Additional pseudoatoms are located in the centers of the virtual bonds connecting consecutive alpha carbons. These pseudoatoms support a model of main-chain hydrogen bonds. Docking starts from a collection of random configurations of modeled molecules. Interacting molecules are flexible; however, higher accuracy models are obtained when the conformational freedom of one (the larger one) of the assembling molecules is limited by a set of weak distance restraints extracted from the experimental (or theoretically predicted) structures. Sampling is done by means of Replica Exchange Monte Carlo method. Afterwards, the set of obtained structures is subject to a hierarchical clustering. Then, the centroids of the resulting clusters are used as scaffolds for the reconstruction of the atomic details. Finally, the all-atom models are energy minimized and scored using classical tools of molecular mechanics. The method is tested on a set of macromolecular assemblies consisting of proteins and peptides. It is demonstrated that the proposed approach to the flexible docking could be successfully applied to prediction of protein–peptide and protein–protein interactions. The obtained models are almost always qualitatively correct, although usually of relatively low (or moderate) resolution. In spite of this limitation, the proposed method opens new possibilities of computational studies of macromolecular recognition and mechanisms of assembly of macromolecular complexes. Figure Superimposition of the predicted and native structures of of 1A2X complex. The receptor is shown in ribbons and covalent structure is shown for the peptide ligand, the result of flexible, de novo, dockingKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP6 comparative modeling categoryProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2005
- Assessment of CASP6 predictions for new and nearly new fold targetsProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2005
- Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold-recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of modelsProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2005
- Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small ProteinsScience, 2005
- Protein Folding with a Reduced Model and Inaccurate Short-Range RestraintsMacromolecular Theory and Simulations, 2005
- HCPM--program for hierarchical clustering of protein modelsBioinformatics, 2005
- A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculationsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2003
- FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variationsJournal of Molecular Biology, 2001
- Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information 1 1Edited by J. ThorntonJournal of Molecular Biology, 1997
- Modelling the polypeptide backbone with ‘spare parts’ from known protein structuresProtein Engineering, Design and Selection, 1989