Experience of a Scientific Panel Formed to Advise the Federal Judiciary on Silicone Breast Implants
- 16 March 2000
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 342 (11), 812-815
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200003163421111
Abstract
Scientific methods for determining truth differ from judicial methods. Scientists confer, develop theories, and then test their theories by performing data-based research. If important findings appear to be inconsistent with the prevailing theory, the theory may be altered. It is often necessary to accumulate data from multiple studies and disciplines in order to understand the causes of disease and develop effective treatments. At the heart of these activities are collaboration, consultation, and communication of research findings. A scientific consensus on the relation between potentially causal factors and disease arises from the preponderance of data reported in the literature.In the . . .Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-Analyses of the Relation between Silicone Breast Implants and the Risk of Connective-Tissue DiseasesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Project Offers Judges Neutral Science AdviceScience, 1999
- Evaluating the Health Risks of Breast Implants: The Interplay of Medical Science, the Law, and Public OpinionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996