Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves
- 21 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 44 (2), 384-388
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.053
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- 15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves in the mitral position: Ten-year follow-upThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality After Cardiac Valvular OperationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Carpentier-edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance to seventeen yearsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: Ten-year resultsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1995
- Intermediate clinical results after aortic valve replacement with the carpentier-edwards pericardial bioprosthesisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Carpentier-edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position: Long-term follow-up 1980 to 1994The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: A comparison of late results in 1,593 patientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- The Ionescu-Shiley Pericardial Valve: Results in 473 PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- The third generation Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: Early resultsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985