Grandfathering, auctioning and Carbon Leakage: Assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS Directive
- 20 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Energy Policy
- Vol. 38 (5), 2420-2430
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.035
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading SchemeClimate Policy, 2009
- Emissions Trading and the Polluter-Pays Principle: Do Polluters Pay under Grandfathering?Review of Law & Economics, 2008
- CO2 emission allowance allocation mechanisms, allocative efficiency and the environment: a static and dynamic perspectiveEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 2007
- Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why?Climate Policy, 2006
- Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sectorClimate Policy, 2006
- CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sectorClimate Policy, 2006
- CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocationClimate Policy, 2006
- Free allocation of allowances under the EU emissions trading scheme: legal issuesClimate Policy, 2006