Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data
Open Access
- 13 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Orthopaedics
- Vol. 36 (1), 51-56
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1255-1
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as a treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee shows good results in terms of patient satisfaction. For the assessment of outcome and revision rate after total joint arthroplasty, there are two major data sources: clinical studies and national arthroplasty registers. The purpose of this study was to analyse the outcome of Anatomic Graduated Component (AGC) TKA reported in clinical studies and to perform a comparison with the outcome reported by national arthroplasty registers. A systematic literature review was performed using standardised methodology in order to determine the outcome and revision rate of AGC TKA. In a comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical studies and worldwide register results we examined the quality of the basic data and the occurrence and influence of potential bias factors. Confidence intervals were calculated to determine the statistical significance of differences. We found significant differences as regards the revision rate measured in revisions per 100 observed component years. Compared to worldwide register data it turned out to be significantly lower in clinical studies published by the implant development team. Actually, they reported a revision rate of 0.18 revisions per 100 observed component years, whereas annual reports of national arthroplasty registers report 0.74 revisions per 100 observed component years. A comparison of the results from national arthroplasty registers of different countries revealed a significantly higher revision rate for Denmark in relation to worldwide register data. A conventional meta-analysis of clinical studies is affected by the influence of the development team and therefore subject to bias. For the assessment of outcome arthroplasty register data should be rated as superior and, being used as reference data for the detection of potential bias factors in the clinical literature, could make an essential contribution to the quality of scientific meta-analysis.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplastyInternational Orthopaedics, 2010
- High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a systematic reviewInternational Orthopaedics, 2009
- Navigation knee replacementInternational Orthopaedics, 2008
- Hybrid Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- A comparison of survival of moulded monoblock and modular tibial components of 751 AGC total knee replacements in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritisThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- A Comparison of the PCL-Retaining AGC and Posterior Stabilizing Legacy Prostheses for Total Knee ArthroplastyHSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2006
- All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty—a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: Part 2. Completely cemented components: MB not superior to AP componentsActa Orthopaedica, 2005
- All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty—a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: Part 1. Horizontally cemented components: AP better fixated than MBActa Orthopaedica, 2005
- Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritisActa Orthopaedica, 2005
- The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992Acta Orthopaedica, 1994