Do Higher Grades Lead to Favorable Student Evaluations?
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Economic Education
- Vol. 36 (1)
- https://doi.org/10.3200/jece.36.1.29-42
Abstract
The relationship between expected grades and student evaluations of teaching (SET) has been controversial. The authors take another look at the controversy by employing class-specific observations and controlling for time-invariant instructor and course differences with a fixed-effects model. The authors' empirical results indicate that if an instructor of a particular course has some classes in which students expect higher grades, a more favorable average SET is obtained in these classes. Moreover, they find that it is the gap between expected grade and cumulative grade point average of incoming students that is the relevant explanatory variable, not expected grade as employed in the previous literature.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Student performance, attrition, and class size given missing student dataEconomics of Education Review, 2001
- Using statistical adjustment to reduce biases in student ratings.American Psychologist, 1999
- How Departments of Economics Evaluate TeachingAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- How Instructors Make a Difference: Panel Data Estimates from Principles of Economics CoursesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1991
- Attributional bias and course evaluations.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990
- Evaluations and Grades: A Simultaneous FrameworkThe Journal of Economic Education, 1983
- Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regressionBiometrika, 1983
- The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.American Psychologist, 1980
- Specification Tests in EconometricsEconometrica, 1978
- Some Evidence on the Variables Associated with Student Evaluations of TeachersThe Journal of Economic Education, 1976