Portfolios for assessment of paediatric specialist registrars
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 38 (10), 1117-1125
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01961.x
Abstract
In 1997 the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health introduced portfolios to guide and monitor the learning of specialist registrars. We studied their value for assessment.Using Bigg's SOLO criteria we devised a marking scheme based on 6 domains of competence: clinical, communication, teaching and learning, ethics and attitudes, management and evaluation, and creation of evidence. We rated portfolios according to quality of evidence presented and expectations by year of training. We similarly assessed trainee performance in the annual record of in-training assessment (RITA) interview. Specific advice based on the results of the first portfolio assessments was circulated to all trainees, instructing them to increase the structure and decrease the bulk of portfolios. A second sample of portfolios was reviewed a year later, using similar evaluations, to determine the effects.A total of 76 portfolios were assessed in year 1 by a single rater; 30 portfolios were assessed in year 2 by 2 independent raters. The quality of documentation improved from year 1 to year 2 but there was no significant increase in portfolio scores. The inter-rater correlation coefficient of the portfolio assessment method was 0.52 (Cohen's kappa 0.35). The inter-rater correlation coefficient of the RITA interview was 0.71 (Cohen's kappa 0.38). There was moderate inter-assessment correlation between portfolios and RITA interviews (kappa 0.26 in year 1 and 0.29 in year 2). Generalisability analysis suggested that 5 successive ratings by a single observer or independent ratings by 4 observers on the same occasion would be needed to yield a generalisability coefficient > 0.8 for overall portfolio rating.This method of portfolio assessment is insufficiently reliable as a sole method for high stakes, single-instance assessment, but has a place as part of a triangulation process. Repeated portfolio assessment by paired observers would increase reliability. Longer term studies are required to establish whether portfolio assessment positively influences learner behaviour.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Portfolio-based assessments in medical education: are they valid and reliable for summative purposes?Medical Education, 2002
- Generalisability: a key to unlock professional assessmentMedical Education, 2002
- Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: discussions between assessorsMedical Teacher, 2002
- Portfolio assessment in medical students' final examinationsMedical Teacher, 2001
- Cognitive and learning styles in medical educationAcademic Medicine, 1999
- Large‐scale Portfolio Assessments in the US: evidence pertaining to the quality of measurementAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1998
- Portfolio learning in general practice vocational training – does it work?Medical Education, 1998
- Learning portfolios: Potential to assist health professionals with self-directed learningJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 1996
- Feedback in Clinical Medical EducationJAMA, 1983
- The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinationsMedical Education, 1980