Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 356 (9244), 1844-1847
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03246-3
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: retrospective interview studyBMJ, 2000
- Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at termThe Lancet, 1997
- Doppler ultrasonography in suspected intrauterine growth retardation: a randomized clinical trialUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Pulmonary angiography performed with iopamidol: complications in 1,434 patients.Radiology, 1996
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- A meta-analysis of the therapeutic role of oil soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography: a surprising result?Fertility and Sterility, 1994
- The Efficacy of Diagnostic ImagingMedical Decision Making, 1991
- Intussusception Reduced by Barium EnemaClinical Pediatrics, 1988
- Evaluating and comparing imaging techniques: a review and classification of study designsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1987
- The role of before-after studies of therapeutic impact in the evaluation of diagnostic technologiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986