Intravenous Propofol during Cesarean Section
Open Access
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 71 (6), 827-834
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198912000-00003
Abstract
Placental transfer and neonatal effects of propofol were investigated in 21 women undergoing elective cesarean section under general anesthesia. This study was conducted in two separate phases according to the use of propofol. In both phases, anesthesia was induced with an iv bolus of 2.5 mg/kg of propofol. In phase 1 (n = 10), anesthesia was maintained with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen and halothane. In phase 2 (n = 11), a continuous infusion of propofol at a rate of 5 mg.cntdot.kg-1.cntdot.h-1 was started after the induction dose. Maternal venous and umbilical cord arterial and venous samples were obtained at delivery. The propofol concentration in whole blood was measured with a high performance liquid chromatography method. Where possible, breast milk/colostrum was expressed for both phases postoperatively and a sample of blood was collected during phase 2 from neonates via a heel prick 2 h after birth. Propofol crossed the placenta, as demonstrated by concentrations found in umbilical venous blood in phase 1 (0.13-0.75) .mu.g/ml) and in phase 2 (0.78-1.57 .mu.g/ml). At delivery, the ratio of the drug concentration in umbilical venous blood to that in natural blood was 0.70 .+-. 0.06 for phase 1 and 0.76 .+-. 0.10 for phase 2. The ratio of propofol concentration in the umbilical artery to that in the umbilical vein was 1.09 .+-. 0.04 for phase 1 and 0.70 .+-. 0.05 for phase 2. The mean propofol concentration in samples taken via a heel prick 2 h after birth in 8 neonates during phase 2 was low (0.078 .+-. 0.011 .mu.g/ml) and represented about 10% of the corresponding umbilical cord artery concentration at time of delivery. The very limited milk/colostrum data indicated that propofol concentrations were low (phase 1:0.089-0.24 .mu.g/ml; phase 2: 0.04-0.74 .mu.g/ml). Furthermore, propofol is cleared rapidly from the neonatal circulation and exposure of the neonate through breast milk/colostrum would be negligible compared to the placental transfer of the drug. In both phases, propofol seemed to have minimal efects on the healthy newborns. These results justify the performance of additional studies of propofol administration during general anesthesis for cesarean section, especially to compare propofol with thiopental and to evaluate the effect of this drug on the high risk fetus.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concentrations of thiopentone in mature breast milk and colostrum following an induction doseActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1987
- DISPOSITION OF PROPOFOL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERYBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1986
- Comparative Maternal and Neonatal Effects of Halothane and Enflurane for Cesarean SectionActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1985
- Comparison of the Effects of General and Regional Anesthesia for Cesarean Section on Neonatal Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity ScoresAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1985
- USE OF AN EMULSION OF ICI 35868 (PROPOFOL) FOR THE INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- COMPARISION OF THE NEW EMULSION FORMULATION OF PROPOFOL WITH METHOHEXITONE AND THIOPENTONE FOR INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA IN DAY CASESBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- PHARMACOLOGY OF AN EMULSION FORMULATION OF ICI 35 868British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1984
- NEONATAL EFFECT OF PROLONGED ANESTHETIC INDUCTION FOR CESAREAN-SECTION1981
- ETOMIDATE FOR INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA AT CAESAREAN SECTION: COMPARISON WITH THIOPENTONEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1979
- Plasma thiopental concentrations in the newborn following delivery under thiopental—nitrous oxide anesthesiaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1966