Active choice but not too active: Public perspectives on biobank consent models
- 1 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Genetics in Medicine
- Vol. 13 (9), 821-831
- https://doi.org/10.1097/gim.0b013e31821d2f88
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- RECONSIDERING THE VALUE OF CONSENT IN BIOBANK RESEARCHBioethics, 2011
- Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment: Box 1.Genome Research, 2010
- Principles of Human Subjects Protections Applied in an Opt‐Out, De‐identified BiobankClinical and Translational Science, 2010
- Public and Biobank Participant Attitudes toward Genetic Research Participation and Data SharingPublic Health Genomics, 2010
- A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debateSocial Science & Medicine, 2008
- Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: Insights from a public dialogueBMC Medical Ethics, 2008
- DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectivesGenetics in Medicine, 2008
- Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanksEMBO Reports, 2006
- Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?The Lancet Oncology, 2006