Interpreting and Reporting Results Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 10, S116-S124
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00274.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approachesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomesQuality of Life Research, 2005
- Assessing Meaningful Change in Quality of Life Over Time: A Users' Guide for CliniciansMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status MeasuresMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worseningQuality of Life Research, 2002
- Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United StatesQuality of Life Research, 2000
- What are minimal important changes for asthma measures in a clinical trial?European Respiratory Journal, 1999
- Impact of the global on patient perceivable change in an asthma specific QOL questionnaireQuality of Life Research, 1996
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Interpretation of quality of life changesQuality of Life Research, 1993