Prospective Randomized Study of Doxorubicin-Eluting-Bead Embolization in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of the PRECISION V Study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 12 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
- Vol. 33 (1), 41-52
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9711-7
Abstract
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) offers a survival benefit to patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A widely accepted TACE regimen includes administration of doxorubicin-oil emulsion followed by gelatine sponge—conventional TACE. Recently, a drug-eluting bead (DC Bead®) has been developed to enhance tumor drug delivery and reduce systemic availability. This randomized trial compares conventional TACE (cTACE) with TACE with DC Bead for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with HCC. Two hundred twelve patients with Child-Pugh A/B cirrhosis and large and/or multinodular, unresectable, N0, M0 HCCs were randomized to receive TACE with DC Bead loaded with doxorubicin or cTACE with doxorubicin. Randomization was stratified according to Child-Pugh status (A/B), performance status (ECOG 0/1), bilobar disease (yes/no), and prior curative treatment (yes/no). The primary endpoint was tumor response (EASL) at 6 months following independent, blinded review of MRI studies. The drug-eluting bead group showed higher rates of complete response, objective response, and disease control compared with the cTACE group (27% vs. 22%, 52% vs. 44%, and 63% vs. 52%, respectively). The hypothesis of superiority was not met (one-sided P = 0.11). However, patients with Child-Pugh B, ECOG 1, bilobar disease, and recurrent disease showed a significant increase in objective response (P = 0.038) compared to cTACE. DC Bead was associated with improved tolerability, with a significant reduction in serious liver toxicity (P < 0.001) and a significantly lower rate of doxorubicin-related side effects (P = 0.0001). TACE with DC Bead and doxorubicin is safe and effective in the treatment of HCC and offers a benefit to patients with more advanced disease.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Trends in the United States From 1975 to 2005Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Survival of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Nolatrexed or DoxorubicinJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survivalHepatology, 2003
- Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomaHepatology, 2002
- Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Clinical Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL ConferenceJournal of Hepatology, 2001
- Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The BCLC Staging ClassificationSeminars in Liver Disease, 1999
- Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with lipiodol chemoembolization: a multicenter randomized trialJournal of Hepatology, 1998
- Prospective randomized trial of chemoembolization versus intra-arterial injection of 131I-labeled-iodized oil in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomaHepatology, 1997