Predictions of Phase-Locking in Excitatory Hybrid Networks: Excitation Does Not Promote Phase-Locking in Pattern-Generating Networks as Reliably as Inhibition
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 102 (1), 69-84
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00091.2009
Abstract
Phase-locked activity is thought to underlie many high-level functions of the nervous system, the simplest of which are produced by central pattern generators (CPGs). It is not known whether we can define a theoretical framework that is sufficiently general to predict phase-locking in actual biological CPGs, nor is it known why the CPGs that have been characterized are dominated by inhibition. Previously, we applied a method based on phase response curves measured using inputs of biologically realistic amplitude and duration to predict the existence and stability of 1:1 phase-locked modes in hybrid networks of one biological and one model bursting neuron reciprocally connected with artificial inhibitory synapses. Here we extend this analysis to excitatory coupling. Using the pyloric dilator neuron from the stomatogastric ganglion of the American lobster as our biological cell, we experimentally prepared 86 networks using five biological neurons, four model neurons, and heterogeneous synapse strengths between 1 and 10,000 nS. In 77% of networks, our method was robust to biological noise and accurately predicted the phasic relationships. In 3%, our method was inaccurate. The remaining 20% were not amenable to analysis because our theoretical assumptions were violated. The high failure rate for excitation compared with inhibition was due to differential effects of noise and feedback on excitatory versus inhibitory coupling and suggests that CPGs dominated by excitatory synapses would require precise tuning to function, which may explain why CPGs rely primarily on inhibitory synapses.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Functional Phase Response Curves: A Method for Understanding Synchronization of Adapting NeuronsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2009
- Phase Resetting Curves Allow for Simple and Accurate Prediction of Robust N:1 Phase Locking for Strongly Coupled Neural OscillatorsBiophysical Journal, 2009
- Phase-Resetting Curves Determine Synchronization, Phase Locking, and Clustering in Networks of Neural OscillatorsJournal of Neuroscience, 2009
- Predicting n:1 locking in pulse coupled two-neuron networks using phase resetting theoryBMC Neuroscience, 2008
- Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generationBrain Research Reviews, 2007
- Behavioral andIn VitroCorrelates of Compulsive-Like Food Seeking Induced by Operant Conditioning inAplysiaJournal of Neuroscience, 2007
- Stability criterion for a two-neuron reciprocally coupled network based on the phase and burst resetting curvesNeurocomputing, 2005
- Mechanisms of Rhythm Generation in a Spinal Locomotor Network Deprived of Crossed Connections: The Lamprey HemicordJournal of Neuroscience, 2005
- Variation Is the Spice of Life. Focus on “Cycle-to-Cycle Variability of Neuromuscular Activity in Aplysia Feeding Behavior”Journal of Neurophysiology, 2004
- Firing Between Two Spike Thresholds: Implications for Oscillating Lobster InterneuronsScience, 1981