Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities
Top Cited Papers
- 18 October 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
- Vol. 97 (5), 261-275
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x
Abstract
Bibliometric studies are increasingly being used for research assessment. Bibliometric indicators are strongly methodology-dependent but for all of them, various types of data normalization are an indispensable requirement. Bibliometric studies have many pitfalls; technical skill, critical sense and a precise knowledge about the examined scientific domain are required to carry out and interpret bibliometric investigations correctly.Keywords
This publication has 135 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact factors: facts and mythsEuropean Radiology, 2002
- Citation mining: Integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profilingJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001
- How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communicationJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000
- Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation historiesJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998
- The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public scienceResearch Policy, 1997
- The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issueBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- Evidence of complex citer motivationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1986
- An investigation of the validity of bibliographic citationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1983
- Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessmentJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1983
- Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journalsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1980