Impact factors: facts and myths
- 27 February 2002
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Radiology
- Vol. 12 (4), 715-717
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-001-1212-2
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter?The British Journal of Radiology, 2001
- Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journalsJournal of Information Science, 1999
- A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factorsJournal of Documentation, 1998
- Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating researchBMJ, 1997
- Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?BMJ, 1996
- The dissemination of false data through inadequate citationJournal of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Journal impact factorsNature, 1995
- A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literatureJournal of Information Science, 1995
- National citationsNature, 1990
- How research becomes knowledge in radiology: an analysis of citations to published papersAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1988