Neck Dissection: Radical or Conservative
- 1 November 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
- Vol. 86 (6), 737-744
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000348947708600604
Abstract
Four hundred and forty-five neck dissections for epidermoid carcinoma over a 10-year period are reviewed as to local recurrence of neck disease. Three hundred and fortyseven dissections were radical en bloc procedures and in 98 a modified conservative technique was utilized. Cervical lymph node classification was applied and a comparison made of the two techniques. A review of the anatomy of cervical fascias and the technique of conservative neck dissection is given. Evaluation of this series of cases indicate that the control of local disease in the neck in the N0 and N1 groups is accomplished as well with conservative dissection as with radical neck dissection. The number of conservative neck dissections for N2 disease was too limited for accurate comparison. There were no conservative neck dissections done for N3 disease. We suggest that conservative neck dissection be utilized for subclinical and N1 disease and that the classic en bloc dissection be reserved for N2 and N3 situations.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Posterior Triangle in Radical Neck SurgeryJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1976
- LXXXI A Conservation Technique in Radical Neck DissectionAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1967
- LXXI Cervical Lymphatic System as Visualized by LymphographyAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1964
- The Value of Radical Dissection of Structures of the Neck in the Management of Carcinoma of the Lip, Mouth, and LarynxArchives of Surgery, 1962
- Neck dissectionCancer, 1951
- EXCISION OF CANCER OF THE HEAD AND NECK.WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE PLAN OF DISSECTION BASED ON ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-TWO OPERATIONS.JAMA, 1906