EVALUATION OF TESTS
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 41 (1), 19-25
Abstract
In order to correctly evaluate a test, at least 4 attributes should be measured: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and precision. Sensitivity is the proportion of diseased animals which are correctly identified, whereas specificity is the proportion of health animals which are correctly identified. These 2 attributes are important, not only because of the reasons implied by their definition but because they influence both the apparent prevalence of disease and the proportion of test-positive animals which are actually diseased. The ability of a test to give a true measurement of the substance being measured, its accuracy, and its ability to give consistent results on the same sample, its precision, are good measures of quality control. Both these attributes influence the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Inaccuracies and inconsistencies arise from the test itself, the technician and the nature of the sample being tested.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Probability Graph Describing the Predictive Value of a Highly Sensitive Diagnostic TestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974
- PREDICTIVE VALUE OF LABORATORY TESTSThe Lancet, 1974
- The diagnosis, control and eradication of bovine brucellosis in Great BritainPublished by Wiley ,1974
- Error Rates in Cervical Cytological Screening TestsBritish Journal of Cancer, 1974
- The Rose Bengal testPublished by Wiley ,1971
- Canine Pulmonary Disease and the Urban EnvironmentArchives of environmental health, 1970
- Further evaluations of serologic test procedures used to diagnose brucellosis.1969
- Predictive Value of a Single Diagnostic Test in Unselected PopulationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966
- Evaluation of Screening Tests in Medical DiagnosisBiometrics, 1964