Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature
Top Cited Papers
- 9 August 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 297 (5583), 950-953
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073947
Abstract
On the eve of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, it is timely to assess progress over the 10 years since its predecessor in Rio de Janeiro. Loss and degradation of remaining natural habitats has continued largely unabated. However, evidence has been accumulating that such systems generate marked economic benefits, which the available data suggest exceed those obtained from continued habitat conversion. We estimate that the overall benefit:cost ratio of an effective global program for the conservation of remaining wild nature is at least 100:1.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Making markets work for forest communitiesInternational Forestry Review, 2003
- Rethinking Green ConsumerismScientific American, 2002
- Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense?Ecological Economics, 2001
- Can We Defy Nature's End?Science, 2001
- Forest, Plantation Crops or Small-scale Agriculture? An Economic Analysis of Alternative Land Use Options in the Mount Cameroon AreaJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2001
- Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policyEcological Economics, 2000
- SPECIAL SECTION: FORUM ON VALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICESEcological Economics, 1998
- Ecosystem services value, research needs, and policy relevance: a commentaryEcological Economics, 1998
- Private and social returns from wetland preservation versus those from wetland conversion to agricultureEcological Economics, 1993
- Sustainability, Human Welfare, and Ecosystem HealthEnvironmental Values, 1992