Coronary artery bypass grafting with minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation; an economic analysis
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 168 (6), 5336-5343
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2013
- Hospital Costs and Unexpected Demand: The Case of GreeceThe Open Economics Journal, 2011
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Improved quality and cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting in the United States from 1988 to 2005The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009
- Attenuated Renal and Intestinal Injury After Use of a Mini-Cardiopulmonary Bypass SystemThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- The economics of blood: Gift of life or a commodity?International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2006
- Four Years’ Experience With a Miniaturized Extracorporeal Circulation System and Its Influence on Clinical OutcomeArtificial Organs, 2004
- Principles of Good Practice for Decision Analytic Modeling in Health-Care Evaluation: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Modeling StudiesValue in Health, 2003
- The Systemic Inflammatory Response to Cardiac SurgeryAnesthesiology, 2002
- Pooling Research Results: Benefits and Limitations of Meta-AnalysisThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1999