The Efficacy of Second‐Line Anti‐Helicobacter pylori Therapy Using an Extended 14‐Day Levofloxacin/Amoxicillin/Proton‐Pump Inhibitor Treatment – A Pilot Study
- 8 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Helicobacter
- Vol. 17 (5), 374-381
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-5378.2012.00960.x
Abstract
Background Large meta‐analyses of second‐line Helicobacter pylori eradication with fluoroquinolone triple therapy have shown that neither 7‐day nor 10‐day therapy provides 90% or better treatment success. Reports describing second‐line H. pylori eradication using 14‐day fluoroquinolone‐containing triple therapy are few. Current study aimed to determine the efficacy of a 14‐day levofloxacin/amoxicillin/proton‐pump inhibitor regimen as second‐line therapy and the clinical factors influencing the outcome. Materials and methods One‐hundred and one patients who failed H. pylori eradication using the standard triple therapy for 7 days were randomly assigned to either a levofloxacin/amoxicillin/esomeprazole group (levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 14 days) or a esomeprazole/metronidazole/bismuth salt/tetracycline group (esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, metronidazole 250 mg four times daily, tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg four times daily, and tetracycline 500 mg four times daily for 14 days). Follow‐up to assess treatment response consisted of either endoscopy or a urea breath test, which were carried out 8 weeks later. Results Eradication rates attained by levofloxacin/amoxicillin/esomeprazole and esomeprazole/metronidazole/bismuth salt/tetracycline treatments in the per‐protocol analysis were 44/47 (93.6%; 95% CI = 86–99.8) and 43/47 (91.8%; 95% CI = 83.2–98.5). In the intention‐to‐treat analysis, these were 43/47 (86.3%; 95% CI = 76.5–96.1) in the LAE group (four lost to follow‐up) and 43/50 (86%; 95% CI = 76–96) in the EMBT groups. The observed adverse events were 25.5% and 38.5% among the two groups. There was 100% drug compliance among the levofloxacin/amoxicillin/esomeprazole group. Levofloxacin‐resistant strains occurred at a frequency of 32.3%. H. pylori eradication rates for the levofloxacin‐susceptible strains and levofloxacin‐resistant strains were 92% (11/12) and 33% (1/3) in the per‐protocol analysis. Conclusions A 14‐day levofloxacin/amoxicillin/esomeprazole triple therapy approach provides a >90% per‐protocol report card with the caveat that this approach is markedly less effective in the presence of fluoroquinolone resistance. Levofloxacin‐resistant strains are increasing in Taiwan.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized Trial on 14 versus 7 days of Esomeprazole, Moxifloxacin, and Amoxicillin for Second-line or Rescue Treatment of Helicobacter pylori InfectionHelicobacter, 2011
- A new look at anti-Helicobacter pylori therapyWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011
- Efficacy of levofloxacin-based rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection after standard triple therapy: a randomized controlled trialJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2009
- American College of Gastroenterology Guideline on the Management of Helicobacter pylori InfectionAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2007
- A Report Card to Grade Helicobacter pylori TherapyHelicobacter, 2007
- Helicobacter pylori and antibiotic resistanceGut, 2007
- Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus ReportGut, 2007
- Systematic review and meta‐analysis: levofloxacin‐based rescue regimens after Helicobacter pylori treatment failureAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2005
- LevofloxacinDrugs, 2003
- Racial Differences in Birth Weight of Term Infants in a Northern California PopulationJournal of Perinatology, 2002