The effect of vaginal closure technique on early post-operative pain following vaginal prolapse surgery: a feasibility pilot study and qualitative assessment
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in SpringerPlus
- Vol. 3 (1), 1-5
- https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-1
Abstract
Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse is a common surgical procedure. There is little research studying post-operative pain, contrasting with extensive literature on pain after childbirth trauma which shows that suture method has a significant effect on pain. We designed a protocol for a trial comparing suture techniques and post-operative pain, and conducted a pre-protocol pilot to inform our trial design. Routine surgical data, post-operative pain scores (from 10 cm Visual Analogue Scales, VAS) and analgesic requirements were obtained from the notes of a cohort of women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery. Median VAS scores at 4, 12 and 24 hours were compared by suture material used and method of closure (single continuous suture or interrupted sutures). The women whose data were obtained were invited to attend focus groups of up to six people in the twelve weeks following surgery. A semi structured question guide was used, and interviews were recorded, transcribed anonymously and analysed using the constant comparative method of grounded theory. Ethical approval was not sought because formal pre-protocol work is exempt for UK ethical requirements, but formal written consent on standard forms was obtained for publishing outcomes and anonymised comments from participants. Complete VAS data and operative details were available from 41 women. Surgery was completed using absorbable polyglactin sutures with continuous suturing (17 women) or interrupted sutures (24 women). Pain scores at 4 and 12 hours were similar; pain at 24 hours was greater in the women with interrupted sutures (median VAS 3 (range 0–8) versus 1.5 (0–8) (p = 0.0513). Analgesic needs were similar. Two focus groups (nine participants) revealed that women regarded post-operative pain as insignificant and not a topic worthy of formal research. It was apparent that the use, and especially removal of, vaginal packs was a practice associated with pain which women remembered as a significant part of their post-operative experience. Formal pre-protocol work is informative; we found a moderate difference in our proposed outcomes, suggesting a trial was feasible but women themselves were unconvinced of the need for formal research into pain following vaginal surgery.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in womenPublished by Wiley ,2013
- Analysis of the surgical learning curve using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2013
- A longitudinal study of patient and surgeon goal achievement 2 years after surgery following pelvic floor dysfunction surgeryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010
- Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tearsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010
- Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tearsPublished by Wiley ,2007
- Suture erosion and wound dehiscence with permanent versus absorbable suture in reconstructive posterior vaginal surgeryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: A longitudinal study of menopausal womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinencePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?Pain, 1997
- Editorial The need of a taxonomyPain, 1979