Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion and MIC Breakpoints Established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for Detection of mecA -Mediated Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus schleiferi
- 1 February 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 56 (2)
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01653-17
Abstract
Staphylococcus schleiferi is a beta-hemolytic, coagulase-variable colonizer of small animals that can cause opportunistic infections in humans. In veterinary isolates, mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance is significant, with reported resistance rates of >39%. The goal of this study was to evaluate oxacillin and cefoxitin disk diffusion (DD) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for detection of mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in 52 human and 38 veterinary isolates of S. schleiferi. Isolates were tested on multiple brands of commercial media following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods. Zone diameters and MIC values were interpreted using breakpoints in the CLSI M100S 27th edition for Staphylococcus aureus/Staphylococcus lugdunensis, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Results were compared to mecA PCR. Twenty-nine of 90 (32%) isolates were mecA positive. Oxacillin zone sizes and MICs interpreted by S. pseudintermedius breakpoints reliably differentiated mecA positive and mecA negative isolates, with a categorical agreement (CA) of 100% and no very major errors (VMEs) or major errors (MEs) on all media. For cefoxitin DD interpreted using S. aureus/S. lugdunensis and CoNS breakpoints, CA was 85% and 75%, and there were 72% and 64% VMEs and 0 MEs, respectively. For cefoxitin MICs interpreted using S. aureus/S. lugdunensis breakpoints, CA was 81% and there were 60% VMEs and no MEs. Our data demonstrate that oxacillin DD or MIC testing methods using the current S. pseudintermedius breakpoints reliably identify mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in S. schleiferi, while cefoxitin DD and MIC testing perform poorly.Keywords
Funding Information
- Self-funded, Romney Humphries
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genotypic relatedness and phenotypic characterization of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies in clinical samples from dogsAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 2011
- Identification of clinical coagulase-negative staphylococci, isolated in microbiology laboratories, by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and two automated systemsClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2010
- Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolated from dogsResearch in Veterinary Science, 2009
- Evaluation of mucosal and seborrheic sites for staphylococci in two populations of captive psittacinesJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2009
- Screening for skin carriage of methicillin‐resistant coagulase‐positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus schleiferi in dogs with healthy and inflamed skinVeterinary Dermatology, 2008
- Antimicrobial susceptibility and mechanism of resistance to fluoroquinolones in Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferiJournal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2007
- Case of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans endocarditis and metastatic infection in an immune compromised hostTransplant Infectious Disease, 2007
- Comparison of Tests To Detect Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus intermedius , Staphylococcus schleiferi , and Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Canine HostsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Results of Disk Diffusion Testing with Cefoxitin Correlate with Presence of mecA in Staphylococcus sppJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
- International Multicenter Evaluation of Latex Agglutination Tests for Identification of Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001