Effect of the Number of Core Biopsies of the Prostate on Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 156 (1), 110-113
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65956-1
Abstract
We determined the effect of the number of core biopsies of the prostate on predicting the Gleason score of the prostatectomy specimen. The Gleason scores from 124 radical prostatectomy specimens were compared to those from preoperative core needle biopsies of the prostate. The number of cores obtained and tumor stage were compared regarding agreement in prostate cancer score. Four to 6 core biopsies yielded the best results, with agreement within 1 Gleason score in 75 percent of the cases. Further increases in the number of core biopsies did not improve results. Additionally, 37 percent of the well differentiated tumors on core biopsy were stage C. Gleason score from the core biopsy has limitations in respect to predicting prostatectomy tumor score and stage and, therefore, it is problematic for use in therapeutic decision making.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correlation with Grade in 316 Matched ProstatectomiesThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1994
- Local staging of prostate cancer by tumor volume, prostate-specific antigen, and transrectal ultrasoundUrology, 1992
- Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic BiopsiesJournal of Urology, 1992
- Value of random US-guided transrectal prostate biopsy.Radiology, 1990
- Random Systematic Versus Directed Ultrasound Guided Transrectal Core Biopsies of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1989
- A Comparison of Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Biopsy in Diagnosis and Preoperative Grading of Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1989
- Reliability of gleason grading system in comparing prostate biopsies with total prostatectomy specimensUrology, 1985
- The Accuracy of Diagnostic Biopsy Specimens in Predicting Tumor Grades by Gleason’s Classification of Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 1984
- Understaging and undergrading of prostate cancer Argument for postoperative radiation as adjuvant therapyUrology, 1983
- Grading Errors in Prostatic Needle Biopsies: Relation to the Accuracy of Tumor Grade in Predicting Pelvic Lymph Node MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1982