Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Genetics
- Vol. 23 (3), 275-280
- https://doi.org/10.1038/15455
Abstract
As genetic research increasingly focuses on communities, there have been calls for extending research protections to them. We critically examine guidelines developed to protect aboriginal communities and consider their applicability to other communities. These guidelines are based on a model of researcher-community partnership and span the phases of a research project, from protocol development to publication. The complete list of 23 protections may apply to those few non-aboriginal communities, such as the Amish, that are highly cohesive. Although some protections may be applicable to less-cohesive communities, such as Ashkenazi Jews, analysis suggests substantial problems in extending these guidelines in toto beyond the aboriginal communities for which they were developed.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protecting Communities in Research: Philosophical and Pragmatic ChallengesCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 1999
- Participatory Research with Native Community of Kahnawake Creates Innovative Code of Research EthicsCanadian Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Jewish leaders seek genetic guidelines⃛Nature, 1997
- Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APCNature Genetics, 1997
- The carrier frequency of the BRCA1 185delAG mutation is approximately 1 percent in Ashkenazi Jewish individualsNature Genetics, 1995
- A model for minorities or for all?The Medical Journal of Australia, 1992
- Building a New Consensus: Ethical Principles and Policies for Clinical Research on HIV / AIDSIRB: Ethics & Human Research, 1991
- Scientific Value and Validity as Ethical Requirements for Research: A Proposed ExplicationIRB: Ethics & Human Research, 1987