Improvement in Treatment Results and Long-Term Survival of Patients With Esophageal Cancer
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 238 (3), 339-348
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000086545.45918.ee
Abstract
Objective To identify prognostic factors and reasons for improved survival over time in patients with esophageal cancer. Summary Background Data Management strategies for esophageal cancer have evolved with time. The impact of chemoradiation in the overall treatment results has not been adequately studied. Methods From 1990 to 2000, 399 (62.4%) of 639 patients with intrathoracic squamous cancers underwent resection. Two study periods were analyzed: period I (01/1990–06/1995), and period II (07/1995–12/2000); during period II, chemoradiation was introduced. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis and the 2 periods compared. Results Hospital mortality rate after resection decreased from 7.8% to 1.2%, P = 0.002. Five favorable prognostic factors were identified: female gender (female vs. male, HR = 0.66), infracarinal tumor location (infra vs. supra-carinal, HR = 0.63), low pTNM stage (III/IV vs. 0/I/II/T0N1, HR = 1.76), pM0 stage (M1a/b vs. M0, HR = 1.56), and R0 category (R1/2 vs. R0, HR = 2.49). Median survival was 15.8 and 25.6 months in periods I and II, respectively, P = 0.02. More R0 resections were evident in period II, being possible in 63% (period I) and 79% (period II) of patients, P = 0.001. This was attributed to tumor downstaging by chemoradiation and more stringent patient selection for resection in period II. Performing less R1/2 resections in period II coincided with using primary chemoradiation in treating advanced tumors. In patients treated without resection, survival also improved from 3 (period I) to 5.8 months (period II), P < 0.01. Conclusions Survival has improved; chemoradiation enabled better patient selection for curative resections and also resulted in more R0 resections by tumor downstaging. This treatment strategy led to overall better outcome for the whole patient cohort, even in those treated by nonsurgical means.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extended Transthoracic Resection Compared with Limited Transhiatal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the EsophagusNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Treatment Outcomes of Resected Esophageal CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- One-year survey of carcinoma of the oesophagus and stomach in WalesBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Preoperative risk analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagusBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A prospective randomized trialThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Comparison of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophageal Resection for CancerAnnals of Surgery, 1997
- Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: A comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteriaThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
- Pattern of recurrence after oesophageal resection for cancer: Clinical implicationsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Results of a Nationwide Study on the Three-Field Lymph Node Dissection of Esophageal CancerOncology, 1991