QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 October 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 155 (8), 529-536
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
Abstract
In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uptake of newer methodological developments and the deployment of meta-analysis in diagnostic test research: a systematic reviewBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Systematic Review: Accuracy of Anti–Citrullinated Peptide Antibodies for Diagnosing Rheumatoid ArthritisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting GuidelinesPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- Bias in Sensitivity and Specificity Caused by Data-Driven Selection of Optimal Cutoff Values: Mechanisms, Magnitude, and SolutionsClinical Chemistry, 2008
- Observed Differences in Diagnostic Test Accuracy between Patient Subgroups: Is It Real or Due to Reference Standard Misclassification?Clinical Chemistry, 2007
- Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: systematic reviewBMJ, 2006
- Association between Compliance with Methodological Standards of Diagnostic Research and Reported Test Accuracy: Meta-Analysis of Focused Assessment of US for TraumaRadiology, 2005
- Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004