Checkpoints in ER-associated degradation: excuse me, which way to the proteasome?
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Cell Biology
- Vol. 14 (9), 474-478
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distinct Machinery Is Required in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated Degradation of a Multispanning Membrane Protein and a Soluble Luminal ProteinJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2004
- A membrane protein complex mediates retro-translocation from the ER lumen into the cytosolNature, 2004
- A membrane protein required for dislocation of misfolded proteins from the ERNature, 2004
- Evolving questions and paradigm shifts in endoplasmic‐reticulum‐associated degradation (ERAD)BioEssays, 2003
- NEW EMBO MEMBER'S REVIEW: For whom the bell tolls: protein quality control of the endoplasmic reticulum and the ubiquitin-proteasome connectionThe EMBO Journal, 2003
- Quality control in the endoplasmic reticulumNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2003
- Endoproteolytic Activity of the ProteasomeScience, 2003
- Cdc48–Ufd1–Npl4: Stuck in the Middle with UbCurrent Biology, 2002
- Retro-translocation of proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum into the cytosolNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2002
- Sec61p-independent degradation of the tail-anchored ER membrane protein Ubc6pThe EMBO Journal, 2001