Gene Technology Communication
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science Communication
- Vol. 20 (2), 204-226
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547098020002003
Abstract
This article reports the second phase of a three-year project on public perceptions of biotechnology, conducted in Perth, Western Australia. The purposes of this second phase were (1) to further develop a computer-based method for investigating public perceptions of biotechnology with individuals and to extend the method to focus groups, and (2) to report the perceptions of “interested publics” about the use of a genetically engineered pig growth hormone, porcine somatotropin (pST). The authors developed a computer database of information about pST to stimulate, in interviews, respondents' articulation of their knowledge and perceptions of biotechnology. The database was a multimedia package, based on a HyperCard stack on a laptop computer, with information about pST in ten different categories. The indicative data of the pilot sets of interviews suggest that the study's methodology provides a fruitful approach to exploring the background knowledge and perceptions of different publics.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Handbook for Focus Group ResearchPublished by SAGE Publications ,1998
- Problematic Publics: A Critical Review of Surveys of Public Attitudes to BiotechnologyScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1997
- Public attitudes to gene technology: the case of the MacGregor's® tomatoPublic Understanding of Science, 1997
- Teaching biotechnology: identity in the context of ignorance and knowledgeabilityPublic Understanding of Science, 1997
- Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit, and EthicsScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1997
- Information Equity, Public Understanding of Science, and the Biotechnology DebateJournal of Communication, 1995
- CONSUMER PREFERENCE FOR PST‐SUPPLEMENT PORKAustralian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1994
- Proactive and reactive approaches to risk regulationFutures, 1992
- POLITICS, POLICY MAKING AND PRESSURE GROUPS: SOME SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM OF THE AUSTRALIAN POLITICAL SYSTEMAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 1983
- The Group Depth InterviewJournal of Marketing, 1962