European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid‐based cytology*
Open Access
- 15 June 2007
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Wiley in Cytopathology
- Vol. 18 (3), 133-139
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00464.x
Abstract
The current paper presents an annex in the second edition of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. It provides guidance on how to make a satisfactory conventional Pap smear or a liquid‐based cytology (LBC) sample. Practitioners taking samples for cytology should first explain to the woman the purpose, the procedure and how the result will be communicated. Three sampling methods are considered as acceptable for preparing conventional Pap smears: (i) the cervical broom; (ii) the combination of a spatula and an endocervical brush; and (iii) the extended tip spatula. Smear takers should take care to sample the entire circumference of the transformation zone, to quickly spread the cellular material over a glass slide, and to fix the preparation within a few seconds to avoid drying artefacts. According to local guidelines, one of these three methods may be preferred. Sampling with a cotton tip applicator is inappropriate. Similar procedures should be followed for sampling cells for LBC, but only plastic devices may be used. The collected cells should be quickly transferred into a vial with fixative liquid according to the instructions of the manufacturer of the LBC system. Subsequently, the slide or vial and the completed request form are sent to the laboratory for cytological interpretation.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminologyCytopathology, 2007
- The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical CytologyPublished by Springer Nature ,2004
- Prevalence of squamous abnormalities in women with a recent smear without endocervical cells is lower as compared to women with smears with endocervical cellsCytopathology, 2003
- The 2001 Bethesda SystemTerminology for Reporting Results of Cervical CytologyJAMA, 2002
- Longitudinal analysis of histologic high-grade disease after negative cervical cytology according to endocervical status.Cancer, 2001
- Endocervical Status Is Not Predictive of the Incidence of Cervical Cancer in the Years After Negative SmearsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2001
- Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet, 1999
- Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised studiesBMJ, 1996
- Relation between quality of cervical smears and probability of abnormal results.BMJ, 1992
- Latest Aspects of Precancerous Lesions in Squamous and Columnar Epithelium of the CervixInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1970