Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 354 (9192), 1763-1770
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02353-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised studiesBMJ, 1996
- Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathologyCytopathology, 1995
- Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methodsCytopathology, 1994
- Cytological reporting of cervical abnormalities according to endocervical statusBritish Journal of Cancer, 1993
- Comparison Between Cytobrush® and Papaplast® in Sampling Vaginal SmearsActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1991
- Statistics in Medicine: Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardised ratios and ratesBMJ, 1988
- False negative rate in cervical cytology.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1987
- SCREENING FOR CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IN DUNDEE AND ANGUS 1962-81 AND ITS RELATION WITH INVASIVE CERVICAL CANCERThe Lancet, 1985
- The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and WalesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire.BMJ, 1984