Surgical Therapy of Peri‐Implant Disease: A 3‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Cases Treated With 3 Different Techniques of Bone Regeneration
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 72 (11), 1498-1508
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1498
Abstract
Background: Advanced peri‐implant intrabony defects require comprehensive surgical treatment regimens different from periodontal therapy strategies. The purpose of this longitudinal trial was to evaluate the peri‐implant outcomes following guided bone regeneration with 3 treatment protocols.Methods: In 25 patients, 41 peri‐implant defects with supporting bone loss >50% of the implant length were treated with flap surgery plus autogenous bone grafts alone (FG) (controls, n = 12) plus non‐resorbable (FGM) (test 1, n = 20) or bioabsorbable barriers (FGRM) (test 2, n = 9) and supportive antimicrobial therapy. Following submerged healing, the membranes were removed (FGM), and the peri‐implant probing depths (PD), probing bone levels (BL), mobility scores (PT), and intrabony defect height (DH) were radiographically evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 and 3 years post‐therapy.Results: Non‐surgical/anti‐infective therapy resulted in a limited improvement of PD scores after 6 months. At the 3‐year visit, surgical treatment revealed significant changes from baseline for the controls and both of the test groups for PD: 5.1 ± 2.7 mm (FG), 5.4 ± 3.0 mm (FGM), and 2.6 ± 1.6 mm (FGRM), and for BL: 3.2 ± 2.4 mm (FG), 3.4 ± 2.4 mm (FGM), and 2.3 ± 1.6 mm (FGRM), Mann‐Whitney test, P ≤0.05. The changes for DH and PT were significant only for FG‐ and FGM‐treated subjects. The overall improvement for FGRM‐treated patients during the 3‐year observation was less marked. However, the differences between the 3 surgical treatment protocols did not affect the treatment outcomes after 3 years.Conclusions: Autogenous bone grafting is an appropriate treatment regimen to augment open crater‐formed peri‐implant defects. Although certain clinical situations require an additional fixation of barrier membranes, their routine application should be approached with caution. J Periodontol 2001;72:1498‐1508.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- PMN responses following use of 2 biodegradable GTR membranesJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2001
- Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitansin Destructive Periodontal Disease. Three-Year Follow-Up ResultsThe Journal of Periodontology, 2000
- Treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects by regenerative procedures. A clinical study in dogs.Journal of Oral Science, 1999
- Elimination of bacteria on different implant surfaces through photosensitization and soft laser. An in vitro study.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1997
- The effect of antimicrobial theram on peri‐implantitis lesions. An experimental study in the dog.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1996
- Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of peri‐implantitisClinical Oral Implants Research, 1996
- Bacterial colonization on internal surfaces of Brånemark system® implant componentsClinical Oral Implants Research, 1996
- Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis proceduresClinical Oral Implants Research, 1996
- Implant‐tissue interfaces following treatment of peri‐implantitis using guided tissue regeneration. A light and electron microscopic study.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1994
- The macroscopic, microscopic and spectrometric effects of various chemotherapeutic agents on the plasma‐sprayed hydroxyapatite‐coated implant surfaceClinical Oral Implants Research, 1992