A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on Ureteral Stenting after Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 169 (4), 1257-1260
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000053763.30693.ef
Abstract
A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate whether postoperative ureteral stenting is necessary after ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. A total of 58 patients with unilateral ureteral stones were randomized into either stented or unstented groups. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy was performed using a semirigid ureteroscope (6.5/7Fr) and holmium laser without ureteral orifice dilation. There were no selection criteria regarding stone size, location, preoperative ureteral obstruction and hydronephrosis. Endoscopic evidence of stone impaction or mucosal edema/damage did not exclude a patient from the study. Ureteral perforation on completion retrograde pyelogram was the only intraoperative criterion for study exclusion. Postoperative pain scores and symptoms were recorded. Excretory urography was performed to document stone-free status and stricture formation. Radionuclide scan was performed selectively to exclude functional obstruction when ureteral narrowing was found on excretory urogram. Mean stone size +/- SD was 9.7 +/- 4.0 mm. (range 4 to 27). Proximal ureteral stones accounted for 43% of all stones. Stented and unstented groups were comparable with respect to demographic data, stone parameters, preoperative obstruction and hydronephrosis. There was no significant difference in operating time, laser energy used, stone impaction and mucosal edema/damage between the 2 groups. Postoperative pain and symptoms were more severe and frequent (p <0.05) in the stented group. However, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative sepsis and unplanned medical visits. The stone-free and stricture formation rates showed no statistical difference between the 2 groups. Ureteral stenting is not necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones. Ureteral stent increases the incidence of pain and urinary symptoms but does not prevent postoperative urinary sepsis and unplanned medical visits. Severity of preoperative obstruction and intraoperative ureteral trauma were not shown to be determining factors for stenting.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Ureteral Stenting Necessary After Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy? A Prospective, Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Urology, 2002
- ROUTINE URETERAL STENTING AFTER URETEROSCOPY FOR URETERAL LITHIASIS: IS IT REALLY NECESSARY?Journal of Urology, 2001
- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING NONSTENTED VERSUS STENTED URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSYJournal of Urology, 2001
- Outpatient Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Selective Internal Stenting and Factors Enhancing SuccessJournal of Endourology, 2000
- To Stent or Not to Stent? That Is Still the QuestionJournal of Endourology, 2000
- IS STENTING FOLLOWING URETEROSCOPY FOR REMOVAL OF DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI NECESSARY?Journal of Urology, 1999
- URETERAL STRICTURE FORMATION AFTER REMOVAL OF IMPACTED CALCULIJournal of Urology, 1998
- Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for endoscopic lithotripsyUrology, 1995
- Outpatient Fragmentation of Ureteral Calculi with Mini-Ureteroscopes and Laser LithotripsyJournal of Endourology, 1994
- Diagnosis of hydronephrosis: comparison of radionuclide scanning and sonographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980