Micronutrients status of Florida soils under citrus production
- 11 November 1992
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
- Vol. 23 (17-20), 2493-2510
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629209368752
Abstract
Micronutrient nutrition plays an important role in citrus production. Soil extraction techniques to measure the status of bio‐available micronutrients are extremely valuable in the diagnosis of deficient or toxic levels of micronutrients. Mehlich 3 (M3), Mehlich 1 (M1), ammonium bicarbonate‐DTPA (ABDTPA), and ammonium acetate, pH 7.0 (AA), extractants were evaluated for their ability to extract Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn using 45 citrus grove soils, representing 20 soil series with widely varying physical and chemical characteristics and production practices. The mean concentrations of M3 extractable Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn were 5.5‐, 2.2‐, 1.6‐, and 1.2‐fold greater, respectively, than those extracted by M1. ABDTPA was more efficient in the extraction of Fe, Cu, and Zn, as compared to the M1 extradant, by 3.3‐, 3.0‐, and 1.4‐fold, respectively. Among the four extractants, AA was extremely inefficient in extraction of all the four micronutrients. Evaluation of the data from all 45 citrus grove soils revealed significant pH effects on extractable Zn by M3, Ml, and ABDTPA extractants and Fe by M1 and ABDTPA extracts only. However, evaluation of the data from pH x Cu experiment on a Candler fine sand (0–15 cm depth soil; pH ranging from 4.5–6.9) showed a negative relationship between the Fe extracted by M3, Ml, and ABDTPA extradants and soil pH. Both extractable Mn and Zn were positively correlated to soil pH except for Mn extractable by ABDTPA. Good correlations (r2 > 0.52) were observed between M3 vs. Ml extractable Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn and M3 vs. ABDTPA extractable Cu and Zn. Good correlations were generally found between M3 and AA extractable Cu, Mn, and Zn. However, poor extractability of all micronutrients by AA indicated that it is not a suitable extractant for micronutrient analysis of the soil studied. The results suggest that M3 is a suitable extractant for micronutrient analysis on sandy soils under Florida citrus production.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of extractants for testing coastal plain soilsCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1990
- A comparison of methods for measuring extractable Ca, Mg, K, Na, Mn, Al, Fe, and P from New England forest soilsCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1989
- Correlation of Mehlich 3, bray 1, and ammonium acetate extractable P, K, Ca, and Mg for Alaska agricultural soilsCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1987
- Comparisons of soil test phosphorus by Olsen, Bray P1, Mehlich I and Mehlich III methodsCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1985
- Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractantCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1984
- CHANGES IN NH4HCO3-DTPA-EXTRACTABLE ZINC AND IRON AS AFFECTED BY VARIOUS SOIL PROPERTIESSoil Science, 1984
- Greenhouse and field evaluation of the NH 4 HCO 3 ?dtpa soil test for Fe 1Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1982
- Evaluation of the NH4HCO3-DTPA Soil Test for Iron and Zinc1Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1981
- A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro‐ and micro‐nutrients in alkaline soilsCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1977
- AN EXAMINATION OF THE DEGTJAREFF METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, AND A PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE CHROMIC ACID TITRATION METHODSoil Science, 1934