Influences on the Quality of Published Drug Studies
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 12 (2), 209-237
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300009582
Abstract
To practice evidence-based medicine, physicians need data on the clinical effectiveness, toxicity, convenience, and cost of new drugs compared with available alternatives. We give examples of published drug studies that are defective, sometimes because pharmaceutical industry funding has affected their content and quality. We make recommendations on how to avoid these defects.Keywords
This publication has 148 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boardsJAMA, 1992
- Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Redundant PublicationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Helsinki Heart Study: Primary-Prevention Trial with Gemfibrozil in Middle-Aged Men with DyslipidemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy on the Quality of LifeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- Anturane Reinfarction TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- The FDA's Critique of the Anturane Reinfarction TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Sulfinpyrazone in the Prevention of Sudden Death after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Controversy in Counting and Attributing Events in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979