Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domesticaL.) I. Organization of the flight motor
- 25 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
- Vol. 312 (1158), 527-551
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1986.0017
Abstract
Free-flying houseflies have been filmed simultaneously from two sides. The orientation of the flies’ body axes in three-dimensional space can be seen on the films. A method is presented for the reconstruction of the flies’ movements in a fly-centred coordinate system, relative to an external coordinate system and relative to the airstream. The flies are regarded as three-dimensionally rigid bodies. They move with respect to the six degrees of freedom they thus possess. The analysis of the organization of the flight motor from the kinematic data leads to the following conclusions: the sideways movements can, at least qualitatively, be explained by taking into account the sideways forces resulting from rolling the body about the long axis and the influence of inertia. Thus, the force vector generated by the flight motor is most probably located in the fly’s midsagittal plane. The direction of this vector can be varied by the fly in a restricted range only. In contrast, the direction of the torque vector can be freely adjusted by the fly. No coupling between the motor force and the torques is indicated. Changes of flight direction may be explained by changes in the orientation of the body axes: straight flight at an angle of sideslip differing from zero is due to rolling. Sideways motion during the banked turns as well as the decrease of translation velocity observed in curves are a consequence of the inertial forces and rolling. The results are discussed with reference to studies about the aerodynamic performance of insects and the constraints for aerial pursuit.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Satisfying the constraints of causal modelingNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
- The dynamics of height stabilization in DrosophilaPhysiological Entomology, 1984
- The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. I. The quasi-steady analysisPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1984
- Roll-Stabilization During Flight of the Blowfly’s Head and Body by Mechanical and Visual CuesProceedings in Life Sciences, 1984
- Flow-field variables trigger landing in fliesNature, 1982
- The interpretation of a moving retinal imageProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1980
- The relationship between body angle and flight speed in free‐flying DrosophilaPhysiological Entomology, 1978
- Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part I. A quantitative analysisQuarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 1976
- Biology and physics of locust flight. I. Basic principles in insect flight. A critical reviewPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1956
- The flight of the dipterous flyMuscina stabulansFallénPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1940