AN EVALUATION OF ROUTINE OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY
- 1 May 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 58 (5), 391-395
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1988.tb01086.x
Abstract
The value of routine use of operative cholangiography was evaluated in 225 patients. In 65 patients (29%), there was one or more clinical or operative indications for common duct exploration and only 21 cases showed positive cholangiographic findings and were explored. There were four negative explorations in this group. In the remaining 160 patients who had no indication for common duct exploration, 157 had a normal cholangiogram and three had false positive cholangiographic findings and were explored unnecessarily. If operative cholangiography had been performed only on those patients with clinical or operative indications for common duct exploration no ductal stone would have been missed. A selective use of operative cholangiography is advocated and the investigation should be restricted to those patients with clinical or operative indications for exploration of the common bile-duct.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Iatrogenic bile duct strictureBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Is operative cholangiography always necessary?British Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Routine or selective peroperative cholangiographyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Accidental Lesions of the Common Bile Duct at CholecystectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1985
- PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY: ROUTINE OR SELECTIVE?Anz Journal of Surgery, 1982
- ROUTINE OR INDICATED OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY?Anz Journal of Surgery, 1980
- The usefulness of stool screening for diagnosing cholelithiasis in acute pancreatitisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1977
- Retained Calculi within the Biliary Ductal SystemAnnals of Surgery, 1974
- Operative cholangiography. Its effect on the practice of cholecystectomy.BMJ, 1970
- Operative CholangiographyAnnals of Surgery, 1968